The answer to this question depends on how you define "smallest." If you're referring to physical size, then the answer is likely someone like a child who participated in a resistance movement. Children often played crucial roles in resistance efforts, especially during times of war or oppression.
For example, during World War II, young children in occupied countries helped gather intelligence, deliver messages, and even sabotage enemy operations. These acts of bravery, although seemingly small, were crucial in contributing to the overall resistance effort.
However, if you're referring to "smallest" in terms of impact or scale, then the answer is more complex. Many individuals, even those who didn't physically fight, contributed significantly to freedom movements through activism, writing, or simply speaking out against injustice. These actions may not have been as visible as armed resistance, but they played a crucial role in shaping public opinion and ultimately contributing to the fight for freedom.
Ultimately, the "smallest" freedom fighter is anyone who actively contributes to the fight for liberty, regardless of their age, physical size, or the specific actions they take.