Determining the "biggest" serial killer is complex and depends on how you define "biggest." It could refer to the number of victims, the duration of the killing spree, the geographic scope, or the impact on society.
However, it's impossible to definitively answer this question with certainty.
- Records are incomplete. Many historical serial killers likely went undetected or their crimes were not accurately recorded.
- Defining "serial killer" varies. Some experts include mass murderers, while others focus on individuals who kill over a period of time with a cooling-off period between murders.
- Cultural context matters. What constitutes a "serial killer" might differ across cultures and historical periods.
Despite these challenges, some individuals stand out as potential contenders for the title of "biggest" serial killer:
- Luis Garavito: A Colombian serial killer who confessed to killing over 140 young boys.
- Pedro López: Also known as the "Monster of the Andes," a Colombian serial killer who confessed to killing over 300 young girls in Ecuador, Peru, and Colombia.
- Joseph Stalin: While not a traditional serial killer, Stalin's reign of terror led to the deaths of millions of Soviet citizens through forced labor camps, executions, and famine.
Ultimately, the "biggest" serial killer remains a matter of debate and depends on the criteria used.
